IELTS Writing Task 2: Free University Education (Band 9 Sample)
This "to what extent do you agree or disagree" question asks whether university education should be free for all students. A band-9 response states a clear degree of agreement and defends it while weighing the opposing view. Below is a model answer of roughly 280 words that largely agrees, followed by a breakdown of why it scores 9 on all four criteria.
Get your own IELTS essay graded by AI
Band scores on all four criteria, line-by-line corrections and a model rewrite — free to start.
01 · The task
Some people think that university education should be free for all students, regardless of their financial background. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
02 · Band 9 sample answer
283 words · Band 9Whether higher education should be provided free of charge is a long-running debate. Although making universities entirely free raises genuine funding concerns, I largely agree that education at this level should be available to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.
1. Why free education is desirable
The strongest argument is one of fairness and opportunity. When university is expensive, talented students from poorer families are often deterred by the fear of debt, so society loses the doctors, engineers and teachers they might have become. Free education removes that barrier and allows people to be judged on ability rather than wealth. Moreover, a well-educated population benefits the whole country: graduates tend to earn more, pay more tax and drive innovation, so the initial public investment is repaid many times over.
2. Acknowledging the funding problem
The obvious objection is cost. Free tuition must be paid for somehow, usually through higher taxes, and critics argue it is unfair to ask those who did not attend university to subsidise those who did. This is a fair concern. However, it can be addressed through a progressive tax system, in which the graduates who benefit most contribute most once they are earning, rather than by charging fees up front that put off the poorest.
In conclusion, while the funding challenge is real, I strongly agree that university should be free, because education is one of the fairest and most productive investments a society can make in its own future.
03 · Why this scores Band 9
The prompt asks "to what extent", and the answer gives a precise degree — "I largely agree" — rather than a flat yes. It develops that stance through fairness and economic return, while genuinely engaging with the funding objection, then narrows that objection to protect its position.
The essay runs as case-for then a fairly-handled objection, one idea per paragraph, with the stance signalled early. Cohesion is natural — "The strongest argument is...", "Moreover...", "The obvious objection is cost", "However" — marking each turn without a mechanical stack of linkers.
Vocabulary is precise and idiomatic — "deterred by the fear of debt", "judged on ability rather than wealth", "repaid many times over", "a progressive tax system", "up front" — with natural collocation carrying the argument.
A wide range is controlled accurately: a concessive ("Although making universities entirely free raises genuine funding concerns"), a relative clause ("the doctors, engineers and teachers they might have become"), and a "rather than" contrast in the final sentence of the third paragraph. The writing stays error-free.
04 · Useful collocations for this task
Tap a phrase to see what it means and how to use it. Natural collocations like these lift your Lexical Resource score.
05 · Frequently asked questions
What does "to what extent do you agree or disagree" require?
It asks how strongly you agree, not just whether you do. Words such as "largely", "partly" or "strongly" signal the degree. This model says "I largely agree", which lets it defend free education while genuinely engaging with the cost objection.
Should I mention the opposing view even if I disagree with it?
Yes — addressing the strongest counter-argument (here, who pays) and then answering it makes your essay far more convincing than ignoring it. Just make sure you return to and reaffirm your own position afterwards.
Can I bring in economic arguments?
Absolutely. Points about graduates earning more, paying more tax and driving innovation strengthen the "advantages" and are rewarded under Task Response. Keep them plausible and general rather than inventing precise statistics.
How long should the essay be?
At least 250 words; a band-9 answer is usually 260–290. This model is 283 words, enough to argue the main position and address the objection without padding.
Want feedback on your own answer?
Toey grades your essay on Task, Coherence, Lexical Resource and Grammar, then shows exactly how to reach the next band — free to start.
Try the free IELTS Writing grader